Partly allowed¶24

Manish v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC20 Nov 2025NABAIL/9604/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; interim anticipatory bail; Section 109(1) BNS 2023; Section 482 BNSS; Case Crime No. 464 of 2025; Police Station Medical, District Meerut; personal bond Rs. 50,000 with two sureties; Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 1 SCC 694; no criminal history; no injury in alleged incident; false implication; AGA to seek instructions; conditions of bail; cancellation on default; listed fresh 17.12.2025; NABAIL No. 9604 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail till 17.12.2025 on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions; learned AGA directed to seek instructions; case to be put up fresh on 17.12.2025. ¶24

Manish vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Manish is entitled to anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 464 of 2025 under Section 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Medical, District Meerut.

¶11

Court's answer

Applicant Manish, in the event of his arrest, to be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, till 17.12.2025.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

Interim anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions (no tampering with evidence, appearance before the trial Court, no inducement, threat or promise, co-operation during trial, no leaving India without prior permission); in default of any condition, the prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.), by order dated November 20, 2025 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 9604 of 2025, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicant Manish in Case Crime No. 464 of 2025 under Section 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Medical, District Meerut, till 17.12.2025, on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount. Reliance was placed on Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, for the factors of nature and gravity of accusation, antecedents, possibility of flight and the accused's exact role. Counsel for the applicant contended innocence, false implication, absence of injury to anyone and no criminal history. Bail was made subject to conditions against tampering with evidence, inducement or threat, misuse of liberty and leaving India without permission; on default the prosecution may seek cancellation. Learned AGA stated instructions had not been received and was directed to seek them; the case was put up fresh on 17.12.2025.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9604 of 2025

Manish

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Dinesh Kumar	Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 72

¶9

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 464 of 2025 under Section 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Medical, District Meerut with the prayer that in the event of arrest, the applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that no one is said to have received injury in the alleged incident. It is also submitted that applicant has no criminal history to his credit. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court and in case he is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions in the matter as yet.

¶14

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider

¶15

NABAIL No. 9604 of 2025

¶16

¶17

nature and gravity of accusation, antecedents of the accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate the entire available material against the accused carefully and the exact role of accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, let the applicant Manish in the event of his arrest, be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 17.12.2025 with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶24

Put up this case as fresh on 17.12.2025.

¶25

In the meantime, learned AGA is directed to seek instructions in the matter.

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

November 20, 2025

¶28

Vibha Singh

¶29

Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manish v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anshu Kumar Dubey vs State of U.P.

Anjulika Arya vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile X vs State of U.P.

X Juvenile vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shani Badal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others