Gyan Chandra Keshari and 2 Others vs State of U.P.

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 561 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 127(2), 115(2), 310(2), 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicants may be released on bail.

¶11

3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received any instructions as yet.

¶12

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicants submits that case was taken up on earlier occasions twice and the learned AGA was not having instructions. He further submits that applicants are innocent and they have an apprehension that they may be arrested in the abovementioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicants as civil dispute is being given colour of some serious offences. It is also submitted that as per the allegation in the FIR the applicants along with other accused persons are said to have attacked the first informant and looted Rs. 1,080/- and silver coin from her. It was also submitted that applicants undertake to co-operate during trial and they would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the

¶13

NABAIL No. 9177 of 2025

¶14

2

¶15

investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶16

5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶17

6. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicants- Gyan Chandra Keshari, Archana Keshari and Ujjawal Kesarwani involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 18.12.2025 with the following conditions :-

¶18

(i) The applicants shall not tamper with evidence and that they would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶19

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶20

(iii) The applicants would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶21

(iv) The applicants shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶22

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicants herein.

¶23

8. List this case as fresh on 18.12.2025.

¶24

NABAIL No. 9177 of 2025

¶25

3

¶26

9. In the meantime, learned AGA may obtain instructions in the matter.

¶27

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶28

November 24, 2025 Abhishek