Rajendra Prasad Dubey Vs State of U.P. and Another

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7336 of 2025

Rajendra Prasad Dubey	..	...Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Yadav	Kumar,	Sunil Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 69

¶4

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶5

Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.105 of 2025, under Sections 305, 331(4), 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station- Obra, District - Sonbhadra.

¶7

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by the co-accused Ishtekhar Khan in police custody. The said statement, insofar as it implicates the applicant is unreliable. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Co-accused Kamrunisha has been granted anticipatory bail, till submission of police report, by this Court vide order dated 04.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 5934 of 2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.

¶8

NABAIL No. 7336 of 2025

¶9

2

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶11

Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.

¶12

Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was disclosed by the co-accused Ishtekhar Khan in police custody; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence; co-accused Kamrunisha has been granted anticipatory bail, till submission of police report, by this Court; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶13

In the event of arrest, the applicant- Rajendra Prasad Dubey be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him, before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶17

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of

¶18

NABAIL No. 7336 of 2025

¶19

3

¶20

anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶21

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶22

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶23

The application stands disposed of.

¶24

September 9, 2025 Lbm/-

¶25

(Vivek Varma,J.)

¶26

Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajendra Prasad Dubey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Prasad Dubey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases