Shakir v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order only; anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS listed fresh as AGA lacked instructions. Decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7246 of 2025
Shakir
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Brajesh Shukla, Krishna Dutt Tiwari |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
Learned AGA submits that he has not received instructions.
Place this case as fresh on 11.9.2025.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
September 4, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shakir
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/7246/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Nalin Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 · Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court