Dismissed¶12
Ranjeet Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Allahabad HCNABAIL/709/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; dismissal for want of prosecution; applicant absent; no adjournment requested; complainant's counsel present; Ranjeet Kumar v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Court No. 13; Subhash Vidyarthi, J.; September 10, 2025.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution, as nobody was present to press the application when the case was called out and no request for adjournment was made. ¶12