Dismissed¶21

Shahrukh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Sept 2025NABAIL/6377/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS; dismissed for want of prosecution; no representation by counsel; applicant arrested; application infructuous; Shahrukh; Case Crime No. 78 of 2020; Sections 354, 506, 452 IPC; Kotwali Nagar; Bulandshahr; NABAIL No. 6377 of 2025; Samit Gopal; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; September 15, 2025.

What did the court decide?

In the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶21

Shahrukh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6377 of 2025

¶3

Shahrukh

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ali Safdar, Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 64

¶7

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶8

List revised.

¶9

No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present.

¶10

This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant- Shahrukh, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 78 of 2020, under Sections 354, 506, 452 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bulandshahr, during pendency of trial.

¶11

Even previously on 08.08.2025 there was no representation from the side of the applicant but due to incessant rainfall in the interest of justice the matter was adjourned and the following order was passed by this Court:-

¶12

"1. List revised.

¶13

2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for State for the State is present.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the State informs the Court that as per his instructions received, the applicant has been arrested and the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.

¶15

NABAIL No. 6377 of 2025

¶16

¶17

4. Today there is incessant rainfall since 07:30 am and there is possibility of learned counsels not able to reach the Court.

¶18

5. In view of the same, since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned for today.

¶19

6. Let the matter be listed on 29.08.2025 as fresh."

¶20