Beernarayan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail ALLOWED - NABAIL/Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 5623 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 72, Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha, decided October 8, 2025. Applicant: Beernarayan; counsel Mahendra Kumar and Rahul Singh; opposed by A.G.A. Sri S.D. Shukla for State of U.P. Underlying FIR/complaint: Complaint Case no. 67 of 2018, Sections 392, 506 IPC, P.S. Jariya, District Hamirpur; alleged looting of laahi worth Rs. 34,000/-; counter-blast prosecution claimed; earlier section 392 IPC complaint against applicant and three others with summoning of parties. Relied on Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 1 SCC 694 (anticipatory bail factors). Quantum: personal bond Rs. 50,000/- plus two sureties each in like amount; cancellation permitted on condition-default.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted to Beernarayan in the event of arrest, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount, conditioned on: (i) not tampering with evidence and appearance before the trial Court on dates fixed unless exempted; (ii) no direct or indirect inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure; (iii) co-operation during trial and non-misuse of liberty of bail; (iv) not leaving India without prior permission of the Court concerned; default of any condition permits the prosecution to seek cancellation.