Suraj vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134341

Court No. - 69

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 5601 of 2025

Applicant :- Suraj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Pandey,Purushottam Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed by the counsel for the applicant, is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State, and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

This application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Sections 60/72 Excise Act, Police Station Faridpur, District Bareilly.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by coaccused Abhay Kumar Shukla in police custody. The said statement, insofar as it implicates the applicant, is unreliable. Neither the alleged godown nor the car from which the illicit liquor was recovered, belong to the applicant. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Identically placed coaccused Sonal has been granted anticipatory bail, till submission of police report, by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 375 of 2025. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 2 of the supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that the investigation is pending and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.

¶10

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.

¶12

Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, in particular the fact, that the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Abhay Kumar Shukla in police custody; identically placed co-accused Sonal has been granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report by this Court; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of

¶13

the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶14

In the event of arrest, the applicant- Suraj be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶15

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶16

(ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶17

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶18

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶19

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶20

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶21

The application stands disposed of.

¶22

Order Date :- 8.8.2025

¶23

Lbm/-

¶24

Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suraj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amrish Giri and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Preetam Singh and 5 Others vs State of U.P.

Sant Singh Yadav vs State of U.P.

Vicky vs State of U.P.

Pradeep and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Kamlesh Kumar vs State of U.P.