Disposed¶8

Hoteram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 Aug 2025NABAIL/5600/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS; withdrawal of bail application with liberty to seek regular bail; Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 352, 117(2) B.N.S.; Case Crime No. 251 of 2024; Police Station Wazirganj, District Budaun; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, SLP (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Vivek Varma, J.; neutral citation 2025:AHC:132209; order dated 6.8.2025.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn; liberty granted to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court and file a regular bail application, to be decided in the light of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (SLP (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, decided 07.10.2021). ¶8

Hoteram and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicants (Hoteram and 2 others) are entitled to anticipatory bail in Case No. 7429 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 251 of 2024, under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 352, 117(2) B.N.S., Police Station Wazirganj, District Budaun.

¶6

Ratio / Principle

The anticipatory bail application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court and file a regular bail application, which shall be decided in the light of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation.

¶8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Vivek Varma, J.), Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:132209 — Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 5600 of 2025, Hoteram and 2 others v. State of U.P. and another (order dated 6.8.2025). The applicants sought anticipatory bail in Case No. 7429 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 251 of 2024, Police Station Wazirganj, District Budaun, under Sections 110, 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 352, 117(2) B.N.S. After arguing the matter at some length, Sri Ravi Shankar Tripathi, counsel for the applicants, prayed for withdrawal with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court and file a regular bail application, which is to be decided in the light of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021 (decided 07.10.2021). Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned A.G.A., appeared for the State.

Hoteram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hoteram and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases