Sanjeev Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21514

Court No. - 70

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 529 of 2025

Applicant :- Sanjeev Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶7

This anticipatory bail application has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No. 706 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 74, 352, 351(2) B.N.S., P.S. Sasni Gate, District- Aligarh, till the conclusion of trial.

¶8

Allegation in the first information report is that applicant had not sold the property for which informant paid money but he had sold parking place of the building. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Allegation alleged in the first information report is false and baseless. It is civil nature dispute. Prima facie , no offence under alleged sections is made out against the applicant. Applicant has no criminal history to his credit. Investigation is still going on. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate with the investigation.

¶9

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant with the contention that the applicant is not entitled for anticipatory bail as prima facie case is made out. The apprehension of the applicant is not founded on any material on record, only on the basis of imaginary fear, the anticipatory bail cannot be granted.

¶10

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case for the limited period considering the exception considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT

¶11

of Delhi)-2020 SCC Online SC 98.

¶12

Let the applicant- Sanjeev Gupta , who is involved in the aforesaid crime, be released on anticipatory bail till submission of police report under Section 193(3) (i) BNSS, on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶13

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶14

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶16

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶17

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.

¶18

The application stands allowed .

¶19

Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Aditya

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjeev Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases