Allowed

Sanjeev Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC19 May 2025NABAIL/3929/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS arising from an FIR alleging offences including culpable homicide. The court found no useful purpose in custodial interrogation considering the gravity of allegations, criminal antecedents, cooperation offered, and facts of the case, and granted anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Applicant directed to be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bond in the event of arrest in FIR No. 57/2025.

Sanjeev Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84941

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3929 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Mishra,Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

1. आववदककवववददनअधधवकद, पररवदददकवववददनअधधवकदशदधदरजककमदर यददवएववरदजयककओरसवउपसससतववददनअपरशदसककयअधधवकदकक सकनदतसदपतदवलदकदपररशदलनवकयद। 2. वतरमदनअवगमजमदनतआववदनपत, मक०अ०सव० 57/2025, अवतररतधदरद 191(2), 191(3), 127(2), 105, 352, 351(3) भदरतदयनयदयस व हतद, सदनद इकवदल , धजलदइटदवदममअवगमजमदनतककमदवरकरतवहहएइसपदसरनदकवसदस पसतकतवकयदरयदहहवकवररफतदरदककसससवतममआववदकककजमदनतपरररहद वकयदजदए। 3. आववदककवववददनअधधवकदददरदतकरवदयदरयदहहवकआववदकवनदरषहह तसदउसवआशवकदहहवकउसवउपय क मदमलवममवररफतदरवकयदजदसकतदहह , जबवकउसकवववरदककईववशवसनदयसदकयनहहहह।उनकवददरदआरवयहभद पसतकतवकयदरयदहहवकमदमलवदकअनयसहअवभय क दरण , धजनककअवगम जमदनतइसदनयदयपदठकवददरदवनरसतहहई , उनसवआववदकककभभवमकदपपसक हह।आववदकददरदकधसतअपरदधकदररतवकयवजदनवकदककईहवत नहहहहतसद कधसतघटनदममआववदकककवववशषभभवमकदभदनहहबतदयदरयदहह।उनकदयह भदतकरहहवकजबचकटहल / मपतककदवचवकतसपरदकणहहआसद , तबउसवपदवच चकटमआनदअ व कतवकयद , जकसदमदनयपकपवतककबतदयदरयद , वकवतकमपतककव शवववचछवदनआखयदकवअनकसदरउसकवशरदरपरआठचकटमआनदअ व कत वकयदरयदहह , जकअवभयकजनकसदनकककस व दगधतदककदवशरतकररहदहह। उनकदयहभदकसनहहवकआववदककवववरदअबतकककईबलपभवरकपवकयद जदरदनहहककरईहहतसदआववदकजदवचवपरदकणकवददरदनसहयकरकरनवकद वचनदवतदहहतसदवहजदवचएजमसदअसवदनयदयदलयददरदअप व कतहकनवपर उनकवसमकउपसससतहकरद।

¶7

4. पररवदददकवववददनअधधवकदएववववददनअपरशसककयअधधवकदददरद

¶8

आववदककवअवगमजमदनतकदववरकधकरतवहहएयहतकरपसतकतवकयदरयदवक ववचदरणनयदयदलयददरदमदमलवकवसमसततथययकदसमगपररशदलनकक दवषरतरखतवहहएउवचतआदवशपदररतवकयदरयदहह, इसपशनरतआदवशमम हसतकवपवकयवजदनवककईऔवचतयपतदतनहहहकरहदहह।उनकदयहभदकसन हहवकमदमलवकवअनयदकसहअवभय क दरणकदअवगमजमदनतइसदनयदयपदठ कवददरदवनरसतवकयदजदच क दहह।अवभय कककधसतघटनदममभभवमकद पररलवकतहह।उनकदयहभदतकरहहवकआववदकददरदकदररतअपरदधरवभदर पकपवतकदहह, इसधलएअवभय कदअवगमजमदनतपदसरनदपतवनरसतवकयव जदनवयकगयहह।

¶9

5. यहकहदजदसकतदहहवक Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 , कवमदमलवमममदननदय उचचतमनयदयदलयनवमदनदहहवकअवगमजमदनतपरवनणरयकरतवसमय नयदयदलयककआरकपककपकपवतऔररवभदरतद, अवभय कदपभवरवपत, अवभय कवनयदयसवभदरनवककसवभदवनदपरववचदरकरनदचदवहएतसदनयदयदलयकक अवभय कवववरदउपलबधसवपभणरसदमगदकदसदवधदनदपभवरकमभलयदवकनकरनद चदवहएतसदअवभय ककसटदकभभवमकदककभदधयदनममरखनदचदवहए।

¶10

6. उभयपकयकवववददनअधधवकदरणककसकननवऔरवतरमदनआववदनममवकए रएकसनयपरववचदरकरनवकवउपरदवत , यहनयदयदलयइसरदयपरहहवकअवगम जमदनतकवसवबवधममससदवपतकदनभनकवधसददवत, पकयकवववददनअधधवकदओव ककदलदलम, आरकपककपकपवत, आववदकककभभवमकदऔरमदमलवकवसभदतथयय औरपररसससवतययपरववचदरकरतवहहए, अवगमजमदनतपददनकरनवकवधलए ककईउपय एववपयदरपआधदरनहहपसतकतवकयदरयदहह।

¶11

आववदक कदयहअवगमजमदनतआववदनपत 7. तदनकसदर, सवजदवककमदर वनरसत वकयदजदतदहह।

¶12

Order Date :- 20.5.2025 CP.sahani

¶13

Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjeev Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases