Saurabh Kumar @ Monu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Saurabh Kumar @ Monu versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko And Another — Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. - 340 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 13, decided September 19, 2025 by Subhash Vidyarthi, J.; anticipatory bail application DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION — applicant absent at hearing, no pass over or adjournment sought, and steps not taken for issuance of notice to opposite party no.2 despite interim anticipatory bail granted on 22.04.2025. Counsel: Vishal (applicant); G.A., Kulsoom Firoz, Mohd. Saud Khan, Saad Mohd Aslam (opposite parties). Keywords: anticipatory bail, Section 482 BNSS, dismissal for want of prosecution, interim bail, non-appearance, Uttar Pradesh.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution, since nobody appeared for the applicant and no pass over or adjournment was requested, and although interim anticipatory bail had been granted on 22.04.2025, the applicant took no steps for issuance of notice to opposite party no.2.