Disposed

Vivek Kumar Dhakre v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC7 May 2025NABAIL/3099/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a cheating/forgery case under BNS and IT Act. Applicant not named in FIR, implicated only via custodial statements, with no substantive evidence against him. Court granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report on bond with sureties and conditions.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vivek Kumar Dhakre vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73850

¶2

Court No. - 69

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3099 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Dhakre Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlendra Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶7

The present application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.07 of 2025, under sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) 3(5) B.N.S., and 66-C, 66-D of I.T. Act, P.S. Vaidpura, District Etawah.

¶8

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The name of the applicant was disclosed in the statements of Saurab and Vikas Kuma Baghel @ Vikki in police custody. The said statements, insofar as they implicate the applicant, is unreliable. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.

¶11

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the fact that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was disclosed in the statements of Saurab and Vikas Kuma Baghel @ Vikki in police custody; at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without

¶12

commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶13

In the event of arrest, the applicant Vivek Kumar Dhakre be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under section 193 (3) B.N.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶17

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶18

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶19

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶20

The application stands disposed of.

¶21

Order Date :- 7.5.2025 S.S.

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vivek Kumar Dhakre v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vivek Kumar Dhakre v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Munesh vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Mohan and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ompal vs State of U.P.

Faeem Ahmad vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jaswant vs State of U.P.

Mahesh Chandra Gupta vs State of U.P.