Disposed

Sami v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 May 2025NABAIL/2669/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS for an applicant named in a Budhana police station case registered under several BNS sections. No charge sheet had been filed and the applicant had no criminal history; bail was granted subject to conditions including presence during investigation and a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions: Rs 50,000 personal bond plus two sureties until Section 173(2) report is filed, attendance when required, cooperation in investigation, and no tamperin

Sami Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85155

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2669 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Sami Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd Sami dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 76 lu 2025] vUrxZr /kkjk 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 119(1), 110, 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Fkkuk cq/kkuk] ftyk eqtQQjuxj esa vfxze tekur dh ekWx djrs gq, bl izkFkZuk ds lkFk nk;j fd;k x;k gS fd fxjQrkjh dh fLFkfr esa vkosnd dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk ldsA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us iwjd 'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k] bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk;A

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gS] mls mijksDr /kkjkvksa esa }s"ko’k rax o ijs’kku djus dh uh;r ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] bl izdj.k esa vHkh foospuk izpfyr gS rFkk vkjksi i= vHkh rd nkf[ky ugha gqvk gS] vkosnd dks vk’kadk gS fd mls mijksDr of.kZr ekeys esa fxjQ~rkj fd;k tk ldrk gS tcfd mlds fo:) dksbZ fo’oluh; lk{; ugha gSA vkxs ;g Hkh dgk x;k gS fd vkosnd dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha jgk gS vkSj vkosnd ds fo:) vHkh rd dksbZ Hkh ck/;dkjh izfdz;k ugha viukbZ x;h gSA ;g Hkh dgk x;k gS fd vkosnd fopkj.k vkSj tkWp ds nkSjku lg;ksx djus dk opu nsrk gS fd og tkWp ,tsalh ;k U;k;ky; }kjk visf{kr le; ij mifLFkr jgsxkA ;g Hkh dgk x;k gS fd ;fn vkosnd dks vfxze tekur nh tkrh gS rks og tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk] tkWp esa lg;ksx djsxk] U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk vuqikyu djsxk rFkk tekur dh lHkh 'krksZ dk vuqikyu djsxkA

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds vfxze tekur dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶11

;g dgk tk ldrk gS fd Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of

¶12

Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 ds ekeys esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vfxze tekur ;kfpdk ij U;k; fu.kZ;u djrs le; U;k;ky; dks vkjksiksa dh izd`fr vkSj xaHkhjrk] vkjksih dh U;kf;d izfdz;k ls Hkkxus dh laHkkouk ij fopkj djuk pkfg, vkSj ;g fd U;k;ky; dks vkjksih ds fo:) miyC/k lHkh lkexzh dk lko/kkuh ls ewY;kadu djuk pkfg, vkSj vkjksih dh okLrfod Hkwfedk ij Hkh fopkj djuk pkfg,A

¶13

orZeku ekeys esa vfxze tekur laca/kh fof/k ds LFkkfir fl)karksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vkSj i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds dFkuksa] vkjksiksa dh izd`fr] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk vkSj ekeys ds lHkh

¶14

rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fopkj O;Dr fd, vfxze tekur dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶15

rn~uqlkj vfxze tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶16

mijksDr eqdnek vijk/k la[;k; esa lfEefyr vkosnd dh fxjQ~rkjh dh n’kk esa] mls lacaf/kr Fkkus ds Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh dh larqf"V ij :0 50]000@& dk O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij] n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 173(2) ds rgr iqfyl fjiksVZ nkf[ky fd, tkus rd] fuEu 'krksZ ds v/khu vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk,xk %&

¶17

1& vkosnd iqfyl vf/kdkjh }kjk tkWp gsrq visf{kr le; ij mifLFkr jgsxkA

¶18

2& vkosnd ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks izR;{k ;k ijks{k :i ls dksbZ /kedh] oknk ;k izyksHku ugha nsxk ftlls fd og ,sls rF; dks U;k;ky; ds le{k ;k fdlh iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k izdV u djus ij eku tk;A

¶19

3& vkosnd foospuk ,oa fopkj.k ds nkSjku lg;ksx djsaxs vkSj tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxkA

¶20

mijksDr 'krksZ ds mYya?ku dh fLFkfr esa foospukf/kdkjh@vfHk;kstu i{k dks] vkosnd dks iznRr vfxze tekur ds fujLrhdj.k gsrq mi;qDr vkosnu nsus dh Lora=rk gksxhA

¶21

fn0 % 20&5&2025 ds0lh0flag

¶22

2 of 2

¶23

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sami v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sami v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases