Anticipatory bail application under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 IPC was dismissed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55348
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2242 of 2025
Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Parmeshwar Yadav,Uttam Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 792 of 2023, under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Jasrana, District- Firozabad.
At the outset, Sri Uttam Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been arrested. The instant application has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivek Kumar
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
