Anticipatory bail application under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS was rejected after a supplementary affidavit filed a provisional admit card of a different person (Deeksha Yadav) than the applicant (Shikha Yadav), indicating identity discrepancy; no case for interference found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10032
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 195 of 2025
Applicant :- Shikha Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Aditya
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should anticipatory bail be granted to the applicant in Case Crime No. 372 of 2024 under Sections 331(4), 305 BNS?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shikha Yadav
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
