Allowed

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 Mar 2025NABAIL/1663/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant challenging criminal proceedings. The applicant alleged false implication and requested parity with co-accused. The High Court followed the Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal, allowed the application conditionally, and directed surrender of passport.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31293

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1663 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Chauhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Swetashwa Agarwal,Yash Raj Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 02 of 2019, under Section 167, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Kanpur Nagar, till conclusion of trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Applicant was working as Project Officer and now he has retired. He next submitted that similarly placed co-accused, namely, Pradeep Kumar and Yash Pal Singh, have been granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial by Co-Ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 15.02.2024 and 12.03.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 Cr.P.C. Nos. 8055 of 2023 and 1528 of 2024, respectively. Applicant claims parity with the co-accused persons. It has been submitted that in case applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶9

On the other hand, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of " Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)-2020 SCC online SC 98", the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail in this case.

¶11

Without expressing any opinion upon ultimate merits of the case either ways which may be adversely affect the trial of the case, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant- Rajesh Kumar Chauhan , who is involved in the aforesaid crime, be released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶13

i. The applicant shall not leave India during the pendency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

¶14

ii. The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned trial Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned trial Court.

¶15

iii. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶16

iv. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

¶17

v. In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail, the trial Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶18

vi. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶19

Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Aditya

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases