Allowed

Munna Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Apr 2025NABAIL/1368/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in an assault case, noting that the injuries were on non-vital parts and not dangerous to life, and there was no substantive evidence linking the applicant to the offence. The bail was granted till the submission of the police report.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted till submission of police report under Section 193(3) BNSS, upon personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.

Munna Yadav vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:46048

¶2

Court No. - 69

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1368 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Munna Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tripathi,Pankaj Sahni Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Heard counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶7

This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 286 of 2024, under Section 118(1), 352, 118(2) and 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Sigra, District Varanasi.

¶8

Counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the allegations in the F.I.R. the applicant is alleged to have assaulted the husband of the informant by a sharp-edged weapon. As per the medical report, the injured sustained three injuries. The injuries were found on non vital part of the body and in the opinion of doctor the injuries were caused by hard and blunt object. The injury sustained at the right elbow was not dangerous to life. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶10

Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.

¶11

Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured were found on non vital part of the body and in the opinion of

¶12

doctor the injuries were caused by hard and blunt object, the injury sustained at the right elbow was not dangerous to life, at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶13

In the event of arrest, the applicant- Munna Yadav be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the Police Commissioner concerned.

¶17

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶18

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶19

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶20

The application stands disposed of.

¶21

Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Manish Kr

¶22

Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Munna Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vinod Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Ritesh Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Shubham Goyal vs State of U.P.

Nand Kumar Chauhan vs State of U.P. and Another

Natthu Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Veer Singh vs State of U.P. and Another