Disposed¶17

Tarang Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Dec 2025NABAIL/10471/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; S.482 BNSS; B.N.S. Ss.109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3); Case Crime No.428 of 2025; P.S. Jani; District Meerut; interim anticipatory bail till 21.01.2026; personal bond Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties; parity with co-accused Rahul Rana (Bail Appn. No.8757 of 2025, order dt. 06.11.2025); Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 1 SCC 694 relied upon; A.G.A. to obtain instructions; listed fresh 21.01.2026; Allahabad High Court; Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.; 12.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail till 21.01.2026 on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions; learned A.G.A. directed to obtain instructions by the next date; case listed fresh on 21.01.2026 (final decision pending). ¶17

Tarang Tyagi vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether applicant Tarang Tyagi should be granted anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.428 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Jani, District Meerut.

¶10

Court's answer

In the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on interim anticipatory bail till 21.01.2026 on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to stated conditions.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

Bail is conditioned on non-tampering with evidence, appearance before the trial Court on fixed dates, no inducement/threat/promise to dissuade disclosure, cooperation during trial, non-misuse of bail liberty, and not leaving India without prior permission; in default, the prosecution is at liberty to file an appropriate application for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J.), order dated December 12, 2025, in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 10471 of 2025 (Tarang Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another). Applicant sought anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.428 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Jani, District Meerut. Counsel argued innocence and false implication; parity with similarly placed co-accused Rahul Rana, already granted anticipatory bail on 06.11.2025 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.8757 of 2025; that though firing at the first informant was alleged, no one received any firearm injury; absence of criminal history; and undertaking to cooperate with investigation/trial. Learned A.G.A. submitted he had not yet received instructions. Relying on Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 (nature and gravity of accusation, antecedents of accused, possibility of fleeing from justice, evaluation of entire available material, and exact role of accused), the Court granted interim anticipatory bail till 21.01.2026 on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount, imposing conditions (no tampering with evidence; appearance before trial Court unless exempted; no inducement, threat or promise; cooperation during trial and non-misuse of bail; no leaving India without prior permission), with liberty to the prosecution to seek cancellation on breach. Matter listed fresh on 21.01.2026; A.G.A. to obtain instructions by the next date.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10471 of 2025

Tarang Tyagi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Surendra Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 72

¶8

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶9

Heard Shri Surendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶10

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.428 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Jani, District Meerut, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶11

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that similarly placed co-accused Rahul Rana has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 482 BNSS No.8757 of 2025. It is further submitted that as per allegation in the first information report, applicant along with other co-accused persons are said to have opened fire on the first informant but no one is said to have received any injury of firearm in the alleged incident. It is also submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶12

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received

¶13

NABAIL No. 10471 of 2025

¶14

¶15

instructions as yet.

¶16

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 , it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶17

In the event of arrest of the applicant- Tarang Tyagi involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on interim anticipatory bail till 21.01.2026 on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶18

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶19

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶20

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶21

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶22

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶23

List this case on 21.01.2026 as fresh.

¶24

Learned AGA is directed to obtain instructions in the matter by the next date.

¶25

December 12, 2025 RKM

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tarang Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarang Tyagi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Alha Alias Shiv Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ankush Rai and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Pankaj Kapoor vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepak Singhal vs State of U.P. and Another

Arun Yadav @ Monu Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Tigar vs State of U.P.