Anticipatory bail sought in a cheating and forgery case with belated FIR, completed investigation, filed charge-sheet and interim protection during investigation. Granting parity with identically placed co-accused already released on anticipatory bail, the court enlarged the applicant on anticipatory bail subject to standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13102
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 104 of 2025
Applicant :- Kamal Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vineet Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
(i) the applicant shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned;
(ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court;
(iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court.
Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Sachin Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in a 2014-incident case with belated FIR and completed investigation, given parity with co-accused.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kamal Verma
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
