Partly allowed¶22

Nasir Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Dec 2025NABAIL/10392/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 10392 of 2025; Nasir Khan v. State of U.P. and Another; interim anticipatory bail till 29.1.2026; Complaint Case no. 1184 of 2022; Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC; Police Station Kotwali, District Bareilly; sale deed executed by impersonation (Kamlesh as Om Prakash); suit for cancellation by first informant; bona fide purchaser; personal bond Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in like amount; AGA to obtain instructions; fresh hearing 29.1.2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted to Nasir Khan till 29.1.2026 on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount, subject to four stated conditions; matter to be put up fresh on 29.1.2026 with AGA directed to obtain instructions. ¶22

Nasir Khan vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10392 of 2025

Nasir Khan

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sanjay Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 72

¶9

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri S.D. Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Complaint Case no. 1184 of 2022 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Bareilly with the prayer that in the event of arrest, the applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is a bona fide purchaser for value and as per allegations in the complaint, coaccused Kamlesh is said to have executed a sale deed in favour of the applicant by impersonating himself as Om Prakash. It is further submitted that suit for cancellation of the alleged sale deed has been filed by the first informant.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions in the matter as yet.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Nasir Khan in the event of his arrest, be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 29.1.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶15

NABAIL No. 10392 of 2025

¶16

¶17

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶18

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶19

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶20

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶21

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶22

Put up this case as fresh on 29.1.2026.

¶23

In the meantime, learned AGA is directed to obtain instructions in the matter by the next date fixed.

¶24

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶25

December 18, 2025

¶26

Madhurima

¶27

Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nasir Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasir Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajeev Alias Raju and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Gopa Das vs State of U.P.

Upendra and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Pyari vs State of U.P.

Devendra Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjay Gupta vs State of U.P. and Another