Satishchandra Mishra vs State of U.P. and Another

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 384 of 1999, under Sections 419, 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Mau with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received any instructions as yet.

¶13

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant. It is further submitted that similarly placed coaccused Prem Garg has already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.7.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 438 BNSS No. 7341 of 2023. It is further submitted that the applicant is said to be the Director of the Company and the liquidation proceedings are under progress. It is further submitted that chargesheet has already been filed and the applicant is no knowledge of the proceedings of the case and he was not served with summons, bailable warrants and non-bailable warrants. It is further submitted that Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued a specific

¶14

NABAIL No. 10266 of 2025

¶15

2

¶16

direction to the applicant restraining his movement outside the Nagpur till criminal proceedings are continuing which has not been altered by Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is thus submitted that in view of the above restriction imposed by the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court, affidavit of the son of the applicant has been filed. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶17

5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

6. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant- Satishchandra Mishra involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 7.1.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶22

NABAIL No. 10266 of 2025

¶23

3

¶24

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶25

(v) The conditions are supplemental to the conditions imposed by the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court.

¶26

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant herein.

¶27

8. List this case as fresh on 7.1.2026.

¶28

9. In the meantime, learned AGA may obtain instructions in the matter.

¶29

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶30

December 8, 2025 Abhishek

¶31

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satishchandra Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satishchandra Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shabir vs State of U.P. and Another

Ganga Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Zaid vs State of U.P.

Shashank Mishra vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Saleem vs State of U.P. and Another

Mo. Arif vs State of U.P.