Disposed¶11
Zaid v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/42985/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short administrative/jurisdictional order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated December 5, 2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 42985 of 2025 (Zaid vs State of U.P.), Coram: Hon'ble Santosh Rai, J., Court No. 70. Counsel: Rajeev Singh for the applicant; G.A. and Sri Purushottam Maurya (AGA) for the State-respondent. Holding: matter pertains to POCSO Act, hence to be laid as fresh before the appropriate Bench as per jurisdiction. No impugned order described, no precedents cited, no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Direction that the matter be laid as fresh before the appropriate Bench as per jurisdiction, as it pertains to the POCSO Act; no decision on the merits of the bail application. ¶11