Shyamu Prasad v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Apr 2025NA529/648/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedition direction under Section 529 BNSS for a pending Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. complaint case (Misc. Case No.1388 of 2021, Shyamu Prasad vs. Dhruv and others) before Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.14, Gorakhpur; applicant Shyamu Prasad, counsel Munna Tiwari; single-judge bench (Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.); no specific stipulated period fixed; all stakeholders directed to assist expeditious disposal.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the Court concerned to expedite disposal of Misc. Case No.1388 of 2021 without unnecessary adjournments; application stands disposed of. ¶¶11

Shyamu Prasad Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:48702

¶2

Court No. - 80

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 648 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Shyamu Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Munna Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶6

This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Misc. Case No.1388 of 2021 (Shyamu Prasad Vs. Dhruv and others) under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., Police Station Pipraich, District Gorakhpur pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.). Court No.14, Gorakhpur, expeditiously within a stipulated period.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the said case has been filed by the applicant / complainant in the year 2021 wherein summoning order was passed on 15.11.2021 against opposite party no.2 and since then the case is pending for trial. Only dates are being fixed in the matter, therefore, prayer has been made to decide the aforesaid complaint case expeditiously.

¶9

In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for the expeditious disposal of the case, as described above, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶10

It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.

¶11

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 3.4.2025 ss

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyamu Prasad v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyamu Prasad v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases