Mohd. Rizwan v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-line order directing the applicant's counsel to furnish details regarding any pending criminal revision challenging a summons order in a compounding case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4784 of 2025
Mohd. Rizwan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Virendra Kumar Srivastava |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 87 |
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
- The order sheet of Complaint Case No. 5325 of 2018 (Mohd. Rizwan vs. Shobhit), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Hari Parwat, District Agra, indicates that the summoning order dated 22.11.2018 may have been challenged before the Sessions Court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Rizwan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Anil Kumar-X
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA529/4784/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Shekhar Kumar Yadav
- Order 2 · Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court