Accused sought a direction for expeditious disposal of a 2016 gambling case pending at evidence stage in Agra. Court directed the trial court to secure the accused's presence and dispose of the case preferably within one year, binding all stakeholders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37210
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 466 of 2025
Applicant :- Pushpendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lovekush Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.
Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial court be directed to expedite disposal of a pending criminal case under the Public Gambling Act?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Pushpendra
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
