Applicant sought a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Azamgarh to decide his pending sessions trial under Sections 41, 411, 419, 420 and 413 IPC expeditiously. Court disposed of the application directing the trial court to conclude the case in accordance with law without unnecessary adjournments, if no legal impediment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3321 of 2025
Jayhind
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sheo Prasad Yadav |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.
(Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.)
September 15, 2025
Krishna*
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial court be directed to decide S.T. No. 249 of 2018 expeditiously?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jayhind
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
