Disposed¶12

Satyendra Alias Subodh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2025NA528/9702/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Application under Section 528 BNSS; notice served on wrong opposite party (OP-2 instead of OP-3); deprecation of office report dated 11.11.2025; fresh notice to informant; extension of interim order; listing on 16.02.2026; earlier order dated 27.08.2025 issuing notice; Allahabad High Court, Court No. 81; single-judge bench (Avnish Saxena, J.); applicant Satyendra alias Subodh; opposite parties State of U.P. and 2 others; counsel Avdhesh Narayan Tiwari (applicant), Rahul Gaur (holding brief for OP-2), Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, G.A.; digitally signed by Abhishek Ranjan Srivastava.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory directions only: fresh notice to be issued to opposite party no.3 (informant); interim order extended till the next date of listing (16.02.2026); the application remains pending and is not finally adjudicated.

Satyendra Alias Subodh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9702 of 2025

¶3

Satyendra Alias Subodh

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Avdhesh Narayan Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 81

¶7

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

¶8

Sri Avdhesh Narayan Tiwari, learned counsel for the accusedapplicant, Sri Rahul Gaur, learned counsel holding the brief appears on behalf of opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State are present.

¶9

This Court by order dated 27.08.2025 directed the issuance of notice to opposite party no.3. Office report dated 11.11.2025 reveals that the notice has been served on opposite party no.2 instead of opposite party no.3. This report is depricated.

¶10