Disposed¶5

Sangeeta Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Jul 2025NA528/9599/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sangeeta Gupta; State of U.P.; S.B. Singh Bhadauriya; Complaint Case No. 6297 of 2021; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 9599 of 2025; Section 528 BNSS; Section 138 N.I. Act; quashing of complaint proceedings; charge-sheet; consideration of bail; expedition in deciding bail applications; Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation; S.L.P. No. 5191 of 2021; Police Station Etmaddaula; District Agra; Additional Court Court No.2 Agra; Vikas Budhwar J.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; decided 17.7.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the applicant to prefer appropriate proceedings/application before the court below for consideration of bail, to be considered with most expedition in light of the judgment in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation with relation to enlargement on bail. ¶5

Sangeeta Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶5

Issue for consideration

Whether the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 6297 of 2021 (S.B. Singh Bhadauriya Vs. Sangeeta Gupta) under Section 138 N.I. Act, pending before the court of Additional Court, Court No.2, Agra, should be quashed. +1 more

¶2

Court's answer

Interference with the charge-sheet was declined; the Section 528 BNSS application was disposed of, granting the applicant liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings/application before the court below, to be considered with most expedition in light of the judgment in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (S.L.P. No. 5191 of 2021, decided 07.10.2021) with relation to enlargement on bail.

¶5

Ratio / Principle

In the opinion of the Court, once a bail application is preferred, the same shall be considered with most expedition strictly as per the law of the land without any delay.

¶6

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Vikas Budhwar, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 9599 of 2025, decided 17.7.2025: Applicant Sangeeta Gupta sought quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 6297 of 2021 (S.B. Singh Bhadauriya Vs. Sangeeta Gupta) under Section 138 N.I. Act, pending before the court of Additional Court, Court No.2, Agra (Police Station Etmaddaula, District Agra). Learned counsel confined the relief to consideration of bail; learned AGA raised no objection. The Court declined interference with the charge-sheet and disposed of the application, granting the applicant liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings/application before the court below, to be considered with most expedition strictly as per the law of the land, in light of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (decided 07.10.2021, S.L.P. No. 5191 of 2021) with relation to enlargement on bail.

Sangeeta Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangeeta Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases