Dismissed¶12

Vimaldheer v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC15 Sept 2025NA528/6735/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of applicant in revised call; Section 528 BNSS application; Allahabad High Court; single judge (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.); A.G.A. present for State; no adjudication on merits; Vimaldheer v. State of U.P.; decided September 16, 2025.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed for want of prosecution because neither the applicant nor counsel appeared even in the revised call, including on 17.07.2025, 18.08.2025 and the date of hearing. ¶12

Vimaldheer Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6735 of 2025

Vimaldheer

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 4 Others

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Guru Prasad, Samar Bahadur Harijan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 74

¶9

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶10

Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶11

Perusal of the order-sheet indicates that on 17.07.2025 and 18.08.2025, none was present on behalf of applicant even in the revised call to press this application.

¶12

In view of above, the this APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶13

September 16, 2025 Vinod.

¶14

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vimaldheer v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimaldheer v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases