Shivbhole @ Rajkumar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 528 BNSS for quashing criminal proceedings and summoning order. Court consigned application to record, directing applicants to prefer a discharge application instead.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72067
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 6108 of 2025
Applicant :- Shivbhole @ Rajkumar And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Neha Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
- Heard Ms. Neha Khan, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Vikas Sharma, learned State Law Officer for the State.
- This application u/s 528 of BNSS has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 125 of 2023 (Pushpa Prajapati @ Bachchi Devi Vs. Shivbhole @ Rajkumar and others) Under Section 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kaushambi, District Kaushambi, as well as impugned summoning order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi.
- The contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicant No. 1 is the husband, applicant no. 2 is the father-inlaw, applicant no. 3 is the mother-in-law, applicant no. 4 is Married Nanad and applicant no. 5 is Nandoi of the opposite party no. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that though the applicants have obtained bail. She, as per the instructions, submits that the applicants shall be moving appropriate application for discharge.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shivbhole @ Rajkumar And 4 Others
Coram
Vikas Budhwar
RAJESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/6108/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page
- Order 2 · Vikas Budhwar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court