Disposed

Jeete @ Jitendra v. State of U.P through Secretary(Home) U.P., Lucknow and Another

Allahabad HC13 Nov 2025NA528/44296/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 528 BNSS filed to quash a Non Bailable Warrant and orders under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. in a Gangster Act case. The court disposed of the application with a direction that if the applicant surrenders within three weeks and applies for bail, it shall be decided expeditiously. No coercive action was permitted during the surrender period.

What did the court decide?

Direction for expedited bail consideration upon surrender within three weeks; stay on coercive action for three weeks.

Jeete @ Jitendra vs State of U.P through Secretary(Home)… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 44296 of 2025

¶3

Jeete @ Jitendra

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus State Of U.P Through Secretary(Home) U.P., Lucknow And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 78

¶7

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA.

¶9

The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of the Non Bailable Warrant dated 09.11.2021 and order dated 25.07.2022 (under Section 82 of Cr.P.C.) & 20.01.2024 (under Section 83 of Cr.P.C.) passed by learned Special Judge Gangster Act, Court No.12 Ghaziabad in Criminal Case No.73 of 2014 (State Vs. Rinku and others) under Section 2/3 Gangster Act arising from the first information report dated 04.08.2013 bearing Case Crime No.0389 of 2013, Police Station Masuri, District Ghaziabad.

¶10

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicant confined his prayer only to the extent that the present application may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case applicant surrenders before it and applies for bail in pursuance of NBW order dated 09.11.2021, the same may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and applies for bail in pursuance of NBW order dated 09.11.2021, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶12

NA528 No. 44296 of 2025

¶13

¶14

However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant herein in the present case.

¶15

(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)

¶16

November 13, 2025

¶17

Radhika

¶18

Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jeete @ Jitendra v. State of U.P through Secretary(Home) U.P., Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeete @ Jitendra v. State of U.P through Secretary(Home) U.P., Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brijesh Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Pravez Alam and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Dayanand Yadav and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ravendra Singh Alias Shamsher Singh and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Meera Alias Reena vs State of U.P. and Another

Raju Verma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others