Raju Verma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Conditional quashing of electricity-theft prosecution under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act (Amendment), 2003 on agreed deposit of compounding fee; application u/s 528 BNSS; charge-sheet 16.04.2024; cognizance/summoning order 29.11.2024; Session Case (Special Trial) No. 1491 of 2024; Case Crime No. 1610 of 2022; Police Station Anti Theft Ballia; Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Session Judge Ballia; proceedings to close after Electricity Department verifies payment; trial court liberty on default; electricity dues recovery preserved; single-judge bench Vivek Kumar Singh, J.; decided 13.11.2025; no precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Conditional quashing granted: the charge-sheet dated 16.04.2024, cognizance/summoning order dated 29.11.2024 and the entire proceedings of Session Case (Special Trial) No. 1491 of 2024 (arising out of Case Crime No. 1610 of 2022, Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act (Amendment), 2003) are quashed, subject to deposit of compounding charges within one month, filing and verification of the payment receipt, closure of proceedings on verification, liberty to the trial court on non-compliance, and preservation of the Electricity Department's right to realize electricity dues in accordance with law.