Application under Section 528 BNSS dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared for the applicant when the matter was called in the revised list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 4408 of 2025
Sachin
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Yadav, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
(Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.)
October 30, 2025
PS
Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin
State of U.P.
Tej Pratap Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
