Application u/s 528 BNSS, Allahabad High Court; cognizance order dated 04.01.2024 taken before charge-sheet submitted on 05.04.2024; Vikalp Rai and 3 others v. State of U.P. and another; comments of court concerned sought through Sessions Judge, Mau; listed fresh for 20.01.2026; interim stage, no holding recorded.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43959 of 2025
Vikalp Rai And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhand Pratap Singh, Shobhit Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Learned counsel for the applicants pointed out that in the present case charge-sheet has been submitted on 05.04.2024. A certified copy of the same is on record as Annexure No. 1 of the affidavit, whereby cognizance order has been passed prior three months of submitting of charge-sheet on 04.01.2024.
Office is directed to seek comments from the court concerned, who pass the cognizance order, through Sessions Judge, Mau.
Put up this case as fresh on 20.01.2026.
December 15, 2025 Ishan
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cognizance order dated 04.01.2024, passed approximately three months before the charge-sheet in the present case was submitted on 05.04.2024, was properly made.medium confidence¶10
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
Cognizance order dated 04.01.2024, passed approximately three months before the charge-sheet in the present case was submitted on 05.04.2024; the court that passed it is referred to only as 'the court concerned', with comments sought through the Sessions Judge, Mau.¶10
04.01.2024
Charge-sheet in the present case submitted on 05.04.2024.¶10
Certified copy of the charge-sheet placed on record as Annexure No. 1 of the affidavit filed with the application.¶10
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
