Rohit Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Court No. 76), Order dated 13.2.2025, Justice Vinod Diwakar. Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 4224 of 2025 (framed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.) by applicant Rohit Yadav (counsel Surendra Yadav) versus State of U.P. and Another (G.A.). Seeks quashing of non-bailable warrant dated 09.06.2022 issued by Fifth Additional Sessions Judge, Jaunpur in S.S.T. No. 51 of 2020 (State v. Chhotu @ Saurabh Prajapati; Case Crime No. 2434 of 2017; Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters Act; P.S. Line Bazar). Outcome: disposed; warrant not quashed — recall-application route with expeditious decision, four-week no-coercive-action window, and directive dismissing fictitious/repetitive personal exemption applications with reasonable costs.
What did the court decide?
Conditional interim relief only: NBW not quashed by this Court; applicant directed to appear and file a recall application before the trial Court, to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law; no coercive action against the applicant for four weeks or until the recall application is filed, whichever is earlier.