Dismissed¶19

Satvir v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Oct 2025NA528/40784/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of non-bailable warrant; Section 528 BNSS application; Gangster Act Sections 2/3; G.S.T. No. 28 of 2015; case crime no. 382 of 2014; P.S. Vrindavan, District Mathura; absconder since 14.11.2016; charge sheet and cognizance 2015; direction to surrender within 20 days and apply for bail; Allahabad High Court; Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.; decided October 17, 2025; application dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Main prayer for quashing refused; applicant directed to surrender before the court concerned within 20 days and apply for bail, to be considered in accordance with law. ¶19

Satvir Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40784 of 2025

¶3

Satvir

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite

¶8

Party(s)

¶9

Counsel for Applicant(s):Amarendra Mani, Mohan Lal
Shrma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s):G.A.

¶10

Court No. - 78

¶11

HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶12

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as
learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶13

2. This application under Section 528 of BNSS has been
filed by the applicant - Satvir for quashing the non-
bailable warrant dated 12.12.2016 issued by Special Judge
(Gangster Act) / Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Court No. 5, Mathura in G.S.T. No.28 of 2015, arising out
of case crime no. 382 of 2014, under Section 2/3 Gangster
Act, P.S. Vrindavan, District Mathura.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that in
this matter charge sheet was submitted in the year 2015
and cognizance was taken. The present applicant appeared
before the trial court on some dates but from 14.11.2016
he remained absent till now and in this way he is a
absconder for the last about nine years. It is also
submitted that the reasons on account of which the
applicant failed to appear before the trial court were
beyond his control and the applicant has every intention
to appear before the court concerned and participate in
the proceedings of the trial.

¶15

4. Learned AGA appearing for the State opposed the
prayer.

¶16

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case, after perusing the impugned order as well as the
materials brought on record and having considered the

¶17

¶18

NA528 No. 40784 of 2025

¶19

submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties
and the conduct of the applicant, I do not find any good
ground to quash the impugned order. The prayer made in
the application is refused and the application is
dismissed.

¶20

6. However, the applicant is directed to surrender
before the court concerned within 20 days from today and
apply for bail, which shall be considered by the Court
concerned in accordance with law.

¶21

October 17, 2025
safi

¶22

(Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.)

¶23

Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satvir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satvir v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases