Disposed

Yarram Yanji Reddy v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC28 Apr 2025NA528/3900/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an application under Section 528 BNSS. Since the applicant sought to withdraw the quashing prayer and obtain a writ of protection while moving for discharge before the trial court, the court granted a three-week period to do so, directing the trial court to decide expeditiously and restraining coercive action against the applicant during this period.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against the applicant for three weeks, provided they file a discharge application and cooperate; directions to trial court for expeditious disposal.

Yarram Yanji Reddy vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:64832

¶2

Court No. - 71

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 3900 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Yarram Yanji Reddy Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jeet Bahadur Gautam,Ravi Prakash Singh Kushwaha,Seema Devi Khushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application u/s 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 16.12.2022, of Complaint Case No. 4044 of 2019 (Mahesh Multi Trade through Proprietor Mahesh Singh Vs. Pro Young International Private Limited through Managing Director and Others), under Section - 406 I.P.C., Police Station - Barra, District - Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Mahanagar MagistrateVIII, Kanpur Nagar.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the prayer made above is not being pressed and that applicant may be permitted to move an application for discharge before the Trial Court concerned and till then protection may be granted to him.

¶9

In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicant moves an application for discharge before the Trial court concerned within a period of three weeks from today, the same shall be

¶10

considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law by the court concerned. It is further directed that for a period of three weeks from today and in case such an application for discharge is filed within the aforesaid period, till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, provided the applicant cooperates in early disposal of discharge application.

¶11

The application u/s 528 BNSS is disposed of with aforesaid observations.

¶12

Order Date :- 28.4.2025 S Rawat

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yarram Yanji Reddy v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yarram Yanji Reddy v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Satendra Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Chob Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Priyanka Gangawar and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Rohini Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Shahjad vs State of U.P. and 3 Others