Akshay v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a procedural order granting time to file a compromise affidavit and staying further proceedings in the pending criminal case. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38874 of 2025
Akshay
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Padmaker Pandey |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Sri Shubham Srivastava, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submitted that parties settled their dispute with regard to offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 332(C), 351(2) of B.N.S. on the basis of compromise dated 18.8.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Akshay
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/38874/2025
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court