Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 May 2025NA528/3811/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 3811 of 2025 (described in body as u/s 482 Cr.P.C.); Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 others v. State of U.P.; quashing of complaint case no. 1108 of 2022 under Sections 504, 506 IPC; P.S. Awagarh, district Etah; Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate Jalesar; prayer not pressed; liberty to file discharge application within three weeks; expeditious disposal; interim protection; no coercive action; Raj Beer Singh, J.; decided 9.5.2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC:75944.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of; applicants given three weeks to file a discharge application (to be decided expeditiously) and interim protection from coercive action for three weeks and, if the discharge application is filed in time, until its disposal, subject to their cooperation. ¶¶10

Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1108 of 2022 (Narendra v. Judgendra and others) under Sections 504, 506 IPC pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar, Etah should be quashed.

¶¶7

Court's answer

As the quashing prayer was not pressed, applicants were permitted to move an application for discharge before the trial court; any such application filed within three weeks was to be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶¶9

Ratio / Principle

Interim protection: for a period of three weeks, and if a discharge application is filed within that period then till its disposal, no coercive action was to be taken against the applicants, provided they cooperate in early disposal of the discharge application.

¶¶9

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Raj Beer Singh, J.; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:75944): Application titled 'U/S 528 BNSS' (body of the order describes it as u/s 482 Cr.P.C.) by Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 others for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1108 of 2022 (Narendra v. Judgendra and others) under Sections 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Awagarh, district Etah, pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar, Etah. The quashing prayer was not pressed; the Court permitted the applicants to move a discharge application before the trial court within three weeks, to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law, and directed that no coercive action be taken against them for three weeks and, if the discharge application is filed within that period, until its disposal, provided they cooperate in its early disposal. Application disposed of (order dated 9.5.2025).

Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jugendra Singh Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases