Disposed¶12

Jay Prakash Dhakare v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2025NA528/37302/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS quashing application disposed of; Jay Prakash Dhakare v. State of U.P.; Case Crime No. 142 of 2025; Sections 316(2), 318(4), 123, 305(a) BNS; Police Station Etmaddaula, District Agra; order dated 17.09.2025 in Case No. 752 of 2025; prayer for quashing not pressed; direction to surrender within four weeks and seek bail; bail application to be decided expeditiously per Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC Online SC 922; Raj Beer Singh, J.; decided September 24, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction that on the applicant surrendering before the court concerned within four weeks and applying for bail, the bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law; application under Section 528 BNSS disposed of with the aforesaid observations. ¶12

Jay Prakash Dhakare Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37302 of 2025

¶2

Jay Prakash Dhakare	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party	(s) : G.A.

¶3

Court No. - 71

¶4

HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS ') has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including the order dated 17.09.2025, of Case No. 752 of 2025 (Jayprakash Dhakare Vs. State of U.P.), arising out of Case Crime No. 142 of 2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 123, 305(a) of B.N.S., Police Station Etmaddaula, District Agra.

¶7

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the prayer made above is not being pressed and the applicant would appear before the trial Court and a direction may be made to the trial Court to decide the bail application of applicant expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶8

In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application shall

¶9

NA528 No. 37302 of 2025

¶10

¶11

be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶12