Applicant sought setting aside an interim order passed in a domestic violence proceeding; counsel instead sought a direction that the stay application against a 2019 DV Act order be decided by the court below. The High Court disposed of the application permitting the applicant to press the stay application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36051 of 2025
Ashish Upadhyay
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : G.A., Rakesh Kumar Tiwari |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : |
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
September 25, 2025
N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant's stay application against the order dated 12.07.2019 under Sections 12, 18 and 19 DV Act pending before the court below should be directed to be decided.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashish Upadhyay
State Of U.P.
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
