Applicant sought quashing of a criminal complaint case and summoning order under section 406 IPC but delayed filing, failed to appear before the trial court despite executing a bond, leading to issuance of non-bailable warrants. The court found no ground for interference and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35813 of 2025
Ashok Kumar
| Versus | .....Applicant(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Shailendra Ratan Bhushan |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. |
Court No. - 80
Sl. No. 46
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
NA528 No. 35813 of 2025
2
applicant.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
December 16, 2025
o.k.
Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under section 528 BNSS to quash the complaint proceedings and summoning order should be entertained despite delay and non-cooperation with the trial?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashok Kumar
State of U.P.
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
