Dismissed¶14

Bhanu @ Bhavesh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Oct 2025NA528/34065/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS quashing application dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach competent court; applicants Bhanu @ Bhavesh and another; State of U.P.; Session Trial No. 1697 of 2025; case crime No. 375 of 2024; BNS Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 109, 110; Police Station Hathras Kotwali, District Hathras; cognizance/summoning order dated 13.5.2025 by CJM Hathras; single judge (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.); decided October 7, 2025; no ruling on merits, no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction; Office to return certified copies of documents to the applicants' counsel after retaining a xerox. ¶14

Bhanu @ Bhavesh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34065 of 2025

¶3

Bhanu @ Bhavesh And Another

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Devendra Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 75

¶10

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶11

Sri Devendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri A.K. Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶12

The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 1697 of 2025, arising out of case crime No. 375 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 109, 110, B.N.S., Police StationHathras Kotwali, District Hathras as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 13.5.2025, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras.

¶13

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶14

The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶15

Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicants, after retaining a xerox of the same.

¶16

October 7, 2025 T. Sinha

¶17

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bhanu @ Bhavesh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanu @ Bhavesh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases