Disposed

Reeta Kumari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Oct 2025NA528/33848/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 323/504 IPC but did not press the prayer. The court disposed of the application permitting them to seek discharge before the trial court within three weeks, with protection from coercive action till its disposal.

What did the court decide?

Permission to file discharge application within three weeks; no coercive action against applicants till its disposal, subject to cooperation.

Reeta Kumari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33848 of 2025

¶2

Reeta Kumari And 2 Others

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Punyavasi Ram, Yogendra Pratap : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 71

¶6

HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

This application under Section - 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 12.03.2021 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 04.10.2021, of Case No. 6781 of 2021 (State Vs. Reeta Kumari and Others), arising out of N.C.R. No. 236 of 2020, under Sections - 323, 504 IPC, Police Station - Gopiganj, District - Bhadohi, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi Gyanpur.

¶9

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the prayer as made above is not being pressed and that applicants may be permitted to move an application for discharge before the Trial court concerned and till then protection may be granted to the applicants.

¶10

In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicants move an application for discharge before the Trial court concerned within a period of three weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law by the court concerned. It is further directed that for a period of three weeks from today and in case such an

¶11

NA528 No. 33848 of 2025

¶12

¶13

application for discharge is filed within the aforesaid period, till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, provided the applicants cooperate in early disposal of discharge application.

¶14

The application u/s 528 BNSS is disposed of with aforesaid observations.

¶15

October 6, 2025 S Rawat

¶16

(Raj Beer Singh,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Reeta Kumari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reeta Kumari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mansoor Ansari vs State of U.P.

Anoop Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Beenu vs State of U.P. and Another

Monish and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Prem Prakash Tiwari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Gajendra and Another vs State of U.P. and Another