The court quashed criminal proceedings and a summoning order under Sections 323, 506 IPC and the Muslim Women Act following a verified compromise between the applicant and the state.
Quashing of entire criminal proceedings and the summoning order dated 27.05.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32459 of 2025
| Mohd Naeem Alias Danish | .....Applicant(s) |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Araf Khan, Tauseef Khan : Juhi Javed, Sonakshi Arora, G.A. |
Court No. - 79
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
NA528 No. 32459 of 2025
2
SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 64 1 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed.
(Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.)
November 18, 2025 Manoj
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings arising from a compoundable offence should be quashed based on a valid settlement between parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and anotherReferred
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675 · Who else cites this
Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred
Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677 · Who else cites this
Manoj Sharma Vs. State and othersReferred
Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabReferred
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And anotherReferred
Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278
Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and anotherReferred
Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 64 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mohd Naeem Alias Danish
Tej Pratap Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
