Dismissed¶14

Sonu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2025NA528/31809/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative remedy; invocation of inherent jurisdiction barred where appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act is available, per Full Bench ruling in Ghulam Rasool Khan (para-17 (iii), Question No. (III) answered in negative); Section 482 Cr.P.C. parallel recorded; Allahabad High Court, October 13, 2025; Deepak Verma, J.; FIR/order-sheet copy returned.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; applicants given liberty to avail the appropriate/alternative remedy; certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet to be returned as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy on the record. ¶14

Sonu and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31809 of 2025

Sonu And 3 Others

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sanjeev	Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 74

¶10

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶11

Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the State, is taken on record.

¶12

The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶13

In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicants are permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

¶14

The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.

¶15

Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicants as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record.

¶16

October 13, 2025 SKD

¶17

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shahrukh Khan @ Shabbu vs State of U.P. and Another

Zamir Ahmad vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Israyeel and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vikas Kumar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Bantu Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd Rizwan vs State of U.P. and Another