Aryan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31139 of 2025

Aryan

.....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar, Sanjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Praveen Kumar, G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 77

¶6

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶8

The present application has been preferred with prayer to quash the impugned non-bailable warrant dated 11.07.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court no. 13, Saharanpur as well as entire proceeding of Special Case no. 1070 of 2020 (Amit vs. Aryan) arising out of Case Crime no. 0119 of 2020 under sections 377, 506 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, PS- Nakur, District Saharanpur pending in Court of learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court no. 13, Saharanpur.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 jointly submits that on the request of parties the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and by the efforts of mediator the mediation has been successful and it has been stipulated by the parties that they will withdraw all the pending cases filed against each other including the case connected with the instant petition and all the disputes have been settled in terms of the agreement.

¶10

It is also stipulated that the case filed by either parties against each other shall be deemed to have been decided in the light of the present settlement. The parties are not having any further claims or demands against each other and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties.

¶11

NA528 No. 31139 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

Highlighting the report of the Mediation Centre which has been placed on record and is also appended along with order sheet, it is submitted that proceedings of the instant case pending before the court below should be quashed. It is also admitted by learned counsel for opposite party no.2 that the terms of settlement have been complied by the parties and opposite party no.2 is not having any objection, if on the basis of settlement, case pending before trial court be quashed.

¶14

Learned AGA would have no objection if dispute between the parties is settled through the course of mediation.

¶15

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that with regard to the above mentioned case pending before learned court concerned in shape of Case Crime no. 0119 of 2020, the instant application was moved by the applicant. However, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and the efforts of the mediator has resulted in amicable settlement between the parties. A settlement has been placed before this Court by the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Allahabad High Court (appended to the order sheet) wherein the terms and conditions of the settlement has been enumerated and it is categorically stated that the parties have settled the dispute and they do not want to prosecute each other and thus the prayer has been made by learned counsel for the applicants as well as opposite party no.2 to quash the proceedings pending before the court below.

¶16

Since the mediation has been successful and report has been sent along with original settlement executed between the parties, thus in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012)10 SCC 303, Shiji and others Vs. Radhika and others Manu/ SC/1341/2011, Manoj Sharma Vs. State of U.P. (2008) 16 SCC 1 , entire proceedings of above mentioned Special Case no. 1070 of 2020 (Amit vs. Aryan) arising out of Case Crime no. 0119 of 2020 under sections 377, 506 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, PS- Nakur, District Saharanpur pending in Court of learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court no. 13, Saharanpur along with non-bailable warrant dated 11.07.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court no. 13, Saharanpur, are hereby quashed and set aside

¶17

NA528 No. 31139 of 2025

¶18

3

¶19

only in respect of applicant herein.

¶20