Sanjay Kumar Agrawal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to quash charge-sheet and cognizance order in a cheating case, based on a private compromise between the parties. The court directed verification of the compromise by the trial court, sought its report, listed the matter for further hearing, and stayed coercive action against the applicant.
What did the court decide?
Interim stay of coercive action against the applicant till next date; directions for compromise verification.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31118 of 2025
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Sanjeev Kumar Mishra |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
- Sri Vinod Kumar Shukla, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party party no.2 and learned AGA for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 511 IPC should be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/31118/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjiv Kumar
- Order 2 · Sanjiv Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court