Disposed

Sanjay Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2025NA528/25608/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused the applicant's plea to quash the charge-sheet and criminal proceedings. It granted liberty to surrender and apply for bail within 15 days, directing expeditious hearing and instructing that no coercive action be taken during this period.

What did the court decide?

Refusal to quash proceedings; liberty granted to surrender and apply for bail within 15 days with stay on coercive action.

Sanjay Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25608 of 2025

¶2

Sanjay Yadav	.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Nayan Singh	Yadav, Rajeev
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 77

¶3

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶5

The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge-sheet dated 28.10.2023 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 08.01.2024 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- Ist, Court No.1, Jhansi and the entire proceeding of Case No.404 of 2024 (State Vs. Sanjay Yadav) arising out of Case Crime No.207 of 2023, under sections 447, 420, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Prem Nagar, District- Jhansi.

¶6

On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and charge-sheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with charge-sheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.

¶7

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

¶8

Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned

¶9

NA528 No. 25608 of 2025

¶10

¶11

and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶12

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) .

¶13

However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.

¶14

November 6, 2025 Saif

¶15

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjay Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shadab Ali Khan vs Smt. Shabad Khanum and Another

Mohit Jakhmola vs State of U.P. and Another

Mange Ram vs State of U.P. and Another

Rewati Prasad and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Neha Singh and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Tayyab vs State of U.P. and Another